Originally posted by psumike99: Sandusky hasn't even been proven guilty yet.
So you think he is a good guy? Is that why he was let go at age 55? Because he was a good guy?
Do you think there is any chance that he is truly innocent? Are you suggesting that people did not SEE him in the showers with young boys on multiple occasions?
Honestly, some of you are totally blinded by what is so painfully obvious to those of us who are objective. I have no feeling for Joe Pa either way. The facts of the case are obvious. Sandusky is guilty and Joe Pa found out, cut him loose, but kept him affiliated with the program. What part of that confuses you?
It's not like a single severely mentally disturbed drug addict prostitute yelled rape at the end of a party. The comparison between Duke lacrosse and Sandusky is so completely off base that I am shocked more Duke people haven't pointed that out. Two entirely different situations. In every single way.